Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Invited talk at FastPath 2020 (International Workshop on Performance Analysis of Machine Learning Systems) co-located with ISPASS 2020. Article: arxiv.org/pdf/2011.01149.pdf ( code and data ) Reproducibility initiative: systems and ML conferences ( reproduced papers and results ) Workshop program: fastpath2020.github.io/Program Author: Grigori Fursin Abstract: 10 years ago we released our ML-based MILEPOST compiler with all related code and experimental data at cTuning.org. Unfortunately, this research quickly stalled after we struggled to reproduce performance results and predictive models shared by volunteers across rapidly changing systems. In this talk, I will describe my 10-year effort to solve numerous reproducibility issues in ML&systems research. I will share my experience reproducing 150+ systems and ML papers during artifact evaluation at ASPLOS, MLSys, CGO, PPoPP and Supercomputing. This tedious experience motivated me to develop the Collective Knowledge framework and the open cKnowledge.io portal to bring DevOps principles to our research. I will also present cKnowledge solutions - a new way to package and share research artifacts and results with common Python APIs, CLI actions, portable workflows and JSON meta descriptions. Such solutions can be used to automatically build, benchmark and validate ML&system experiments across continuously evolving platforms. I will conclude with several practical use-cases of our technology in collaboration with Arm, IBM, General Motors, the Raspberry Pi foundation and MLPerf. Our long-term goal is to help researchers share their new ML techniques as production-ready packages along with published papers and participate in collaborative and reproducible benchmarking, co-design and comparison of efficient ML/software/hardware stacks.
{"references": ["Grigori Fursin (2020). The Collective Knowledge project: making ML models more portable and reproducible with open APIs, reusable best practices and MLOps. arXiv:2006.07161"]}
portability, machine learning, workflow, artifact evaluation, open science, reusability, systems, benchmarking, reproducibility, automation, fair principles
portability, machine learning, workflow, artifact evaluation, open science, reusability, systems, benchmarking, reproducibility, automation, fair principles
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 273 | |
| downloads | 47 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts