Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Before a company enters a new business relationship it has to perform a background check, known as due diligence. It is commonly carried out by a human expert and involves screening a large amount of unstructured textual information (e.g. news articles), which is extremely labor intensive. We propose to automate this process, which would allow to, firstly, reduce the time needed for article screening, and, secondly, discover new insights about the network the company operates in. The solution includes (a) a classifier that detects articles containing negative events about the company of interest, and (b) a knowledge graph that combines the gained information with structured data sources. We report promising results of the novel approach to utilize semantic frames of the article’s predicates as features for the news article classification. Furthermore, we have successfully built a knowledge graph that combines information from different data sources. The proposed automated pipeline introduces a promising novel alternative for the commonly performed due diligence procedure.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts