Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Introduction Congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) are among the inherited metabolic diseases caused by a defect in protein glycosylation. We have used our modified FASP protocol (‘glycoFASP’) to determine the structures of normal and CDG Type 1 patient Nglycans. Objective Develop a simple FANGS3 protocol to isolate and analyze glycoprotein glycans from human serum. • Apply the glycoFASP method to compare N-glycan profiles between normal control and CDG Type 1 patient. Methodology [Refer to Poster]. Results glycoFASP-released glycans from normal control and CDG Type 1 patient were analysed using MALDI –TOF/TOF MS are shown in Figure 1. The spectrum shows glycans signal (m/z 1419, 1581 and 1744 ) are not observed from CDG Type 1 patient when compared to normal control spectrum. Normal control also produce non fucosylated (m/z 1501) and fucosylated (m/z 1485,1648 and 1810) complex biantennary, bisecting GlcNAc (m/z 1689, 1851, 2013 and 2175) and sialylated (m/z 1955, 2101 and 2246) glycans. Interestingly, CDG Type 1 spectrum also show non fucosylated (m/z 1501) and fucosylated (m/z 1485,1648 and 1810) complex bi-antennary, sialylated (m/z 1955,2101 and 2246) and bisecting GlcNAc (m/z 1689, 1851 and 2013) glycans lacking (m/z 2175 ). These N-glycans signal are markedly lower compared to normal control. Conclusion The difference between normal control and CDG Type 1 glycan structures has been demonstrated. • The protocol is less laborious and reduces time in sample preparation before MALDI analysis. • The protocol works efficiently and convenience for low volume of sample.
Serum N-Glycan Profiling, Mass Spectrometry
Serum N-Glycan Profiling, Mass Spectrometry
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts