Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This repository contains a large dataset for the research of domain generation algorithms (DGAs) and machine learning. At the time of writing the dataset contains more than 90m of domains and more than 100 families. The dataset consists of SLDs from DGAs and their extracted features. The main sources for the DGAs are the following: DGArchive The DGA feed from Network Security Research Lab at 360 The OSINT feeds for DGA from Bambenek Consulting When the samples were sparse, we used the reversed code to create new ones. Johannes Bader Github repo Moreover, it has SLDs from three adversarial DGAs (referred to deception, deception2 and khaos) DGAs and SLDs from the top 1m Alexa domains. Features by the order they appear in the dataset Family: DGA Family SLD: SLD of the domain L-HEX: The domain name is represented with hexadecimal characters L-LEN: The length of Dom L-DIG: The number of digits in Dom L-DOT: The number of dots in the raw domain L-CON-MAX: The maximum number of consecutive consonants Dom L-VOW-MAX: The maximum number of consecutive vowels Dom L-W2: Number of words with more than 2 characters in Dom L-W3: Number of words with more than 3 characters in Dom R-CON-VOW: Ratio of consonants and vowels ofDom R-Dom-3G: Ratio of benign grams in Dom-3G R-Dom-4G: Ratio of benign grams in Dom-4G R-Dom-5G: Ratio of benign grams in Dom-5G R-VOW-3G: Ratio of grams that contain a vowel in Dom-3G R-VOW-4G: Ratio of grams that contain a vowel in Dom-4G R-VOW-5G: Ratio of grams that contain a vowel in Dom-5G R-WS-LEN: Dom-WS divided by L-LEN R-WD-LEN: Dom-WD divided by L-LEN R-WDS-LEN: Dom-WDS divided by L-LEN R-W2-LEN: Dom-W2 divided by L-LEN R-W2-LEN-D: Dom-W2 divided by Dom-D R-W3-LEN: Dom-W3 divided by L-LEN R-W3-LEN-D: Dom-W3 divided by Dom-D GIB-1-Dom: Gibberish detector 1 applied to Dom GIB-1-Dom-WS: Gibberish detector 1 applied to Dom-WS GIB-1-Dom-D: Gibberish detector 1 applied to Dom-D GIB-1-Dom-WDS: Gibberish detector 1 applied to Dom-WDS GIB-1-Dom-W2: Gibberish detector 1 applied to Dom-W2 GIB-1-Dom-W3: Gibberish detector 1 applied to Dom-W3 GIB-2-Dom: Gibberish detector 2 applied to Dom GIB-2-Dom-WS: Gibberish detector 2 applied to Dom-WS GIB-2-Dom-D: Gibberish detector 2 applied to Dom-D GIB-2-Dom-WDS: Gibberish detector 2 applied to Dom-WDS GIB-2-Dom-W2: Gibberish detector 2 applied to Dom-W2 GIB-2-Dom-W3: Gibberish detector 2 applied to Dom-W3 E-Dom: Entropy ofDom E-Dom-WS: Entropy of Dom-WS E-Dom-D: Entropy of Dom-D E-Dom-WDS: Entropy of Dom-WDS E-Dom-W2: Entropy of Dom-W2 E-Dom-W3: Entropy of Dom-W3
{"references": ["Plohmann, Daniel, et al. \"A comprehensive measurement study of domain generating malware.\" 25th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX\u00a0Security 16). 2016.", "X. Yun, J. Huang, Y. Wang, T. Zang, Y. Zhou, and Y. Zhang, \"Khaos: An \u00a0adversarial \u00a0neural \u00a0network \u00a0dga \u00a0with \u00a0high \u00a0anti-detection \u00a0ability\", IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 15, pp.2225\u20132240, 2020.", "Spooren, Jan, et al. \"Detection of algorithmically generated domain names used by botnets: a dual arms race.\" Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing. 2019."]}
DGA, Domain generation algorithms
DGA, Domain generation algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 100 | |
| downloads | 46 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts