Downloads provided by UsageCounts
It is explored how foundational ontologies based on physicalist materialism, nominalism, and Peircean semiotics can be applied to represent signs, models of physical systems, and their use in engineering modelling and simulation practice. It is argued that to conceptualize modelling of physical systems in such a framework, various kinds of Peircean semiotic triads need to be combined. Thereby, a sign (representamen) and a represented object either yield an interpretant, i.e., another representamen of the same object, or the representation is transferred to another object by semantic change through metonymization or metaphorization, retaining the same symbol. Multiple conceivable ways of implementing this ontological paradigm are compared, and a demonstrator implementation is discussed.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 13 | |
| downloads | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts