Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The field of proteomics is on the cusp of realizing the promise of Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA), but there is still a need to develop best practices and improve opportunity for adoption. The Proteomics Research Group (PRG) within the Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) conducted a study to promote adoption of DIA. We developed a study sample set consisting of a HeLa digest spiked with four non-human proteins at different concentrations. These samples were sent to 63 labs from 20 countries around the globe. We provided participants recommended LC gradients and DIA methods for specific instrument platforms, as well as guidelines for method generation on other platforms. Samples were injection-ready, and data was analyzed by PRG members. Of the 63 labs, 40 labs uploaded data as of January 2019, 53 labs filled out survey, and 35 data sets were used for preliminary analysis. Based on survey information, most participants were experienced LCMS users, but few had previously used DIA. Data from most participants reflects expected fold-change of spike-in proteins. Interestingly, accuracy of quantitation was not correlated to previous DIA experience. Overall, by providing a standard sample set and recommended methods for different instrument platforms, and extended trial software licenses for users, the PRG provided an opportunity for labs to evaluate their readiness to carry out DIA analysis. Ongoing work will analyze the complete data set as more labs completed the study after this pilot analysis, providing additional opportunities to evaluate LC and instrument parameters.
Proteomics, multi-lab study, DIA (Data Inedpendent Acquisition)
Proteomics, multi-lab study, DIA (Data Inedpendent Acquisition)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 50 | |
| downloads | 11 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts