
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Issue 11 (2020) of the Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics contains a monographic section in which four articles are published on human enhancement. Two of them (those by Alonso, Anomaly & Savulescu, and Capasso & Santoema) deal with the use of CRISPR gene editing systems for the enhancement of human capabilities. The other two (those of Conradie and Rueda) deal with different ethical aspects of using biotechnology to increase human morality. In the present article, F. Lara and M. Moreno contextualize these four contributions by pointing out the background and interpretative keys to the debates in which they are inserted.
710304, gene editing, research ethics, 7199, human enhancement, 240902
710304, gene editing, research ethics, 7199, human enhancement, 240902
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
views | 4 | |
downloads | 3 |