Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This corpus consits of 200 annotated German legal judgements. In all judgements the parts "conclusion", "definition" and "subsuption" of the German legal writing style "Urteilsstil" (judgement style) are annotated. It belongs to the paper "Design and Implementation of German Legal Decision Corpora" from Urchs et al.[1]. Please cite [1] when using the corpus. The annotation of the corpus was made possible by the research center for legal questions of digitalization processes (“FREDI”) [2]. [1] Urchs Stefanie, Mitrović Jelena, and Granitzer Michael. "Design and Implementation of German Legal Decision Corpora" ICAART. 2021. [2] https://www.jura.uni-passau.de/en/faculty/institutes-and-centres/research-center-for-legal-questions-of-digitalization-processes-fredi/
{"references": ["Urchs Stefanie, Mitrovi\u0107 Jelena, and Granitzer Michael. \"Design and Implementation of German Legal Decision Corpora\" ICAART. 2021."]}
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 173 | |
| downloads | 10 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts