Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Organizations are under constant pressure to adapt comprehensive, systematic and formal quantitative assessment methods for vendor selection focusing on long term relationship potential and enhancing the delivery performance of ongoing projects. As government decisions for future project assignments is dependent on the performance of the ongoing projects.However, the process of vendor selection within the supply chains, is left to the uncertain and imprecise judgements of the decision makers & top management. This limits the usage of comprehensive, systematic and formal quantitative assessment methods for identifying a potential vendor for long term collaboration. Therefore, this article aims at understanding the important criterion/attributes for supplier selection using an Industrial case and providing a methodology for identifying a potential vendor for long term partnership.
Supplier Selection MCDM CRITIC TOPSIS
Supplier Selection MCDM CRITIC TOPSIS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 9 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts