
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1109/tbme.2016.2590950 , 10.5281/zenodo.3897467 , 10.5281/zenodo.3897459 , 10.5281/zenodo.3897460
pmid: 27416585
pmc: PMC5536978
handle: 1805/17600
doi: 10.1109/tbme.2016.2590950 , 10.5281/zenodo.3897467 , 10.5281/zenodo.3897459 , 10.5281/zenodo.3897460
pmid: 27416585
pmc: PMC5536978
handle: 1805/17600
{"references": ["Dundar M, Yerebakan HZ, Rajwa B. Batch discovery of recurring rare classes toward identifying anomalous samples. In: Proc. 20th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data Min. KDD '14. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2014. p 223\u2013232. Available at: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2623330.2623695", "Dundar M, Akova F, Yerebakan HZ, Rajwa B. A non-parametric Bayesian model for joint cell clustering and cluster matching: identification of anomalous sample phenotypes with random effects. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15:314. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-314", "Rajwa B, Wallace PK, Griffiths EA, Dundar M. Automated assessment of disease progression in acute myeloid leukemia by probabilistic analysis of flow cytometry data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017;64(5):1089\u201398. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2016.2590950", "Tario JD, Wallace PK. Reagents and cell staining for immunophenotyping by flow cytometry. In: McManus LM, Mitchell RN, editors. Pathobiology of Human Disease. San Diego: Academic Press; 2014. p. 3678\u2013701. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386456-7.07104-5"]}
Following the endorsement of the Bethesda International Consensus Group, as well as the guidance for classification of hematolymphoid neoplasms introduced by the WHO's Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, flow cytometry (FC) immunophenotyping became a standard tool for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) diagnosis and disease monitoring. The goal of the presented work is building a functional prototype of an automated non-parametric Bayesian clinical decision–support system that can not only recognize the difference between normal and abnormal samples, but most importantly also recognize the direction of change in disease progression on the basis of the FC bone-marrow data alone, without the need to supplement the data with morphology and/or genetic analysis.
Bioinformatics, 610, Immunopathology, nonparametric Bayesian, Sensitivity and Specificity, Pattern Recognition, Automated, AML, Recurrence, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Dirichlet-process mixture model, random effects, Flow cytometry, Cancer Biology, Acute myeloid leukemia, Minimal residual disease, Nonparametric Bayesian, flow cytometry, Reproducibility of Results, 600, Bayes Theorem, Flow Cytometry, Dirichlet process, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, machine learning, Data Interpretation, Statistical, minimal residual disease, Disease Progression, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Algorithms
Bioinformatics, 610, Immunopathology, nonparametric Bayesian, Sensitivity and Specificity, Pattern Recognition, Automated, AML, Recurrence, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Dirichlet-process mixture model, random effects, Flow cytometry, Cancer Biology, Acute myeloid leukemia, Minimal residual disease, Nonparametric Bayesian, flow cytometry, Reproducibility of Results, 600, Bayes Theorem, Flow Cytometry, Dirichlet process, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, machine learning, Data Interpretation, Statistical, minimal residual disease, Disease Progression, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Algorithms
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
views | 7 | |
downloads | 7 |