Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Digitized collections of printed historical texts are important for research in Digital Humanities. However, acquiring high-quality machine readable texts using currently available Optical Character Recognition (OCR) methods is a challenge. OCR Quality is affected by old fonts, old printing techniques, bleedthrough of the ink, paper quality, old spelling, multiple columns and so on. It is unclear which OCR methods perform best. Therefore, we are currently in the process of setting up a benchmark to enable the evaluation of the performance of OCR software on old Dutch texts. The benchmark is being set-up on the EYRA benchmark platform (eyrabenchmark.net) developed by The Netherlands eScience Center and SURF.
OCR, historical texts, benchmark, quality, evaluation, replication, performance metrics
OCR, historical texts, benchmark, quality, evaluation, replication, performance metrics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 8 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts