Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The ERRATAS database is the primary output of the ERRATAS project, which surveyed all the sources of the Corpora of Early English Correspondence (CEEC-400) in order to investigate their editorial principles and practices. These sources are almost exclusively printed editions of English historical correspondence. The data in the ERRATAS database consists of surveys of: editorial principles (explicit statements or anything resembling such); editorial practices (features that can be found in the edited texts); editorial work (evidence of contributors other than the stated editor(s)). The database is in the form of an MS Access database file, which includes separate data entry forms for editorial principles and practices (ie. the texts). A manual is under compilation. Related material: ERRATAS checklist of editorial practices with audit word lists (working document) Corpus of Editorial Principles (in CEEC-400 Sources) List of editions used in CEEC-400 surveyed for the ERRATAS project (as of January 2018) Sairio, Anni, Samuli Kaislaniemi, Anna Merikallio & Terttu Nevalainen. 2018. “Charting orthographical reliability in a corpus of English historical letters”. ICAME Journal 42: 79–96. DOI: doi.org/10.1515/icame-2018-0005. Open access. Version history: 26.5.2020 Version 0.9 – Database unfinished (due to coronavirus restrictions). The current data has been checked twice. Material to be added in v1.0: database manual; database survey guidelines.
corpus linguistics, scholarly editing, philology, linguistic corpora, text editions
corpus linguistics, scholarly editing, philology, linguistic corpora, text editions
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 11 | |
| downloads | 13 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts