Views provided by UsageCounts
Coenochilus parrianus Westwood, 1883 Distribution: ANG. Distribution in Angola (Provinces): 1)? Historic records: — Angola (without locality) (Westwood 1883). Material examined: none Remarks. The species was described from Angola (Westwood 1883). It is considered a controversial species and an incertae sedis (Schein 1954a). Schein (1954a) in the “general comments” (“I. Allgemeines”) referred to Coenochilus parrianus based in Schenkling (1921) catalogue (“ parrianus Westwood Tijdschr. voor Ent. 26 Seite 65 Angola ”). Taking into account this reference, it seems that the species considered by Schein (1954a) is indeed that which was described by Westwood (1883), i.e. Coenochilus parrianus from Angola. The same author stated also that the type of C. parrianus was unfortunately lost, concluding that “The Parrianus not mentioned in the Junk Schenkling catalog should therefore remain omitted” (“Der im Junk-Schenkling-Katalog ausgelassene Parrianus muss also weiter im Dunklen bleiben”). Biological and ecological data are not available, but see general comments in Schein (1954a) and the remarks under the genus Coenochilus.
Published as part of Serrano, Artur R. M., Capela, Rúben A., Nunes, Telmo & Santos, Carmen Van-Dú- Nem Neto, 2020, The rose chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae) of Angola: a descriptive checklist with new records and synonymic notes, pp. 1-130 in Zootaxa 4776 (1) on pages 55-56, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4776.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/3821288
Coleoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Cetoniidae, Taxonomy, Coenochilus, Coenochilus parrianus
Coleoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Cetoniidae, Taxonomy, Coenochilus, Coenochilus parrianus
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts