Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 2108/396805 , 2067/43862
We perform a preliminary study on large graph efficient indexing using a gap-based compression techniques and different node labelling functions. As baseline we use the Webgraph + LLP labelling function. To index the graph we use three labelling functions: Pagerank, HITS, and Pagerank with random walks choosing restart nodes with HITS authority scores. To compress the graphs we use Varint GB, with and without d-gaps, derived by rank value of the labelling function. Overall, we compare 8 different methods on different datasets composed by the WebGraph eu-2005, uk-2007-05@100000, cnr-2000, and the social networks, enron, ljournal-2008, provided by the Laboratory for Web Algorithmics (LAW).
PageRank, Varint GB, HITS, Graph compression, Webgraph LLP, Varint GB, PageRank, HITS, Settore INFO-01/A - Informatica, Graph compression, 004, Webgraph LLP
PageRank, Varint GB, HITS, Graph compression, Webgraph LLP, Varint GB, PageRank, HITS, Settore INFO-01/A - Informatica, Graph compression, 004, Webgraph LLP
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts