Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2018
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2018
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2018
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Amphiuridae Ljungman 1867

Authors: Stöhr, Sabine; Hugall, Andrew F.; Thuy, Ben; Martynov, Alexander;

Amphiuridae Ljungman 1867

Abstract

Family Amphiuridae Ljungman, 1867 Type genus Amphiura Forbes, 1843 (type species: A. chiajei Forbes, 1843). Other genera Acrocnida Gislén, 1926, Amphichondrius Nielsen, 1932, Amphicontus Hill, 1940, Amphigyptis Nielsen, 1932, Amphiodia Verrill, 1899a, Amphiomya H.L. Clark, 1939, Amphioncus H.L. Clark, 1939, Amphioplus Verrill, 1899a, Amphipholis Ljungman, 1866, Amphipholizona H.L. Clark, 1915a, Amphistigma H.L. Clark, 1938, Dougaloplus A.M. Clark, 1970, Microphiopholis Turner, 1985, Nannophiura Mortensen, 1933 b, Nudamphiura Tommasi, 1965, Ophiocentrus Ljungman, 1867, Ophiocnida Lyman, 1865, Ophiodaphne Koehler, 1930, Ophionephthys Lütken, 1869, Ophiophragmus Lyman, 1865, Ophiosphaera Brock, 1888, Ophiostigma Lütken, 1856, Paracrocnida Mortensen, 1940, Paramphichondrius Guille & Wolff, 1984, Paramphiura Koehler, 1895, Triplodia Turner & Hallan, 2011. Diagnosis Dorsal disc cover variable, often naked scales, but simple spines, granules or tubercles occur in some genera. Large infradental papillae. Buccal scale higher on the oral plate than other oral papillae. Dorsalmost tooth socket a large, heart-shaped fenestration with incomplete septum, other dorsal sockets as fenestrations with septum, ventral sockets shallow, not penetrating. Oral plates with large wingshaped abradial muscle flange, often with branching ribs. Arm spine articulations with two smooth separated, parallel, straight dorsal and ventral lobes. Lateral arm plates commonly sickle-shaped with pointed dorsal tip. Lateral arm plates devoid of ornamentation except for band of more finely meshed stereom in the central part of the proximal edge. Inner side of lateral arm plates with two to three knobs instead of a ridge. Remarks This large family requires revision. Preliminary findings (O’Hara et al. 2017) indicate that there are at least three major clades within the group that fit our criteria for family status. Important genera, including Amphiura, Amphioplus and Amphipholis, are polyphyletic in their current composition.

Published as part of Stöhr, Sabine, Hugall, Andrew F., Thuy, Ben & Martynov, Alexander, 2018, Morphological diagnoses of higher taxa in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) in support of a new classification, pp. 1-35 in European Journal of Taxonomy 416 on pages 20-21, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2018.416, http://zenodo.org/record/3806109

Keywords

Animalia, Biodiversity, Ophiuroidea, Amphiuridae, Ophiurida, Taxonomy, Echinodermata

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
  • 3
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
Green
Related to Research communities