Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This work compares the efficiency of the estimators in two probability sampling techniques namely: Simple Random Sampling and Stratified Random Sampling, using the 2006 population figures of the six states in the South-South geopolitical Zone of Nigeria. A table of random digit was used to select appropriate samples for each of these techniques. The selected samples were further used to estimate the population means, variance, standard error and their confidence intervals. The resulting estimates obtained from each technique were compared with the actual population figures. This comparison revealed that Stratified Random Sampling techniques proved more efficient than the simple Random Sampling using the minimum variance criterion. This interesting comparative result obtained at both 95% and 99% Confidence Intervals are shown in tables 3 and 4 in this work.
Probability Sampling Techniques
Probability Sampling Techniques
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 8 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts