Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In the Humanities, data are difficult to define and all the more so to be properly curated and managed. They can be small and smart, rich and complex, non-standardised in format, without common or consistent metadata and ontologies, and can be subject to complex rights issues. Machine readable tools and materials are rarely available and often incomplete or non-interoperable. We are presenting the ongoing works and the preliminary outputs of two complementary initiatives, the CO-OPERAS Implementation Network within GoFAIR and the ALLEA e-Humanities Working Group, two initiatives focusing on community needs and supporting the development of practical recommendations for best practices and services that enable the integration of the long tail of Humanities into the EOSC and more widely to adopt Open Science practices. Our conversation will focus on discussing what data are in the Humanities, identifying the main challenges in the path towards FAIRness and providing recommendations for the digital humanities community.
Recording of the talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_7hp64zHt4
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts