<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

CESSDA SaW D5.1: Benchmarking report, including an action plan for improvements on an inter - consortium and individual archive level

Name: CESSDA SaW D5.1: Benchmarking report, including an action plan for improvements on an inter - consortium and individual archive level
Keywords: Strategy and Policy, Curation and Preservation

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Project deliverable , Other literature type 16 Nov 2017 English Publisher:ZenodoFunded by:EC | CESSDA-SaW

Authors: Alfredsson, Iris; Jerlehag, Birger; Lace, Ilse; Ilijasic Versic, Ivana;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3773183 , 10.5281/zenodo.3773182

CESSDA SaW D5.1: Benchmarking report, including an action plan for improvements on an inter - consortium and individual archive level

- Summary
- Subjects
- Data sources
  (1)
- Metrics

Abstract

The aim of D5.1 is to benchmark, using a set of indicators produced in D3.1 and serving as the basis for a comparison between CESSDA and an “industry best” or “gold standard” organisation. The Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) is taken as the gold standard and has been used as a benchmark organisation for CESSDA. D5.1 contains analysis of differences and a breakdown of actions that should be taken to bring CESSDA up to the level of the gold standard.

Related Organizations

Consortium of European Social Science Data Archives
Norway
Swedish National Data Service
Sweden

Keywords

Strategy and Policy, Curation and Preservation

1 Data sources, page 1 of 1

CESSDA Data Catalogue

datarepository::unknown Compatibility:OpenAIRE Data (funded, referenced datasets)IsRelatedTo

shareShare

Select content type to embed

All Research products

arrow_drop_down

<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=re3data_____::bcf017a6702b1ff5fcaccca1ca44c010&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

more_vert

shareShare

Select content type to embed

All Research products

arrow_drop_down

<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=re3data_____::bcf017a6702b1ff5fcaccca1ca44c010&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Usage byUsageCounts

visibility	views	8
download	downloads	11

8
views
11
downloads
Powered by

Found an issue? Give us feedback

visibility

download

Average

Green

Funded by

EC| CESSDA-SaW