Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The aim of D5.1 is to benchmark, using a set of indicators produced in D3.1 and serving as the basis for a comparison between CESSDA and an “industry best” or “gold standard” organisation. The Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) is taken as the gold standard and has been used as a benchmark organisation for CESSDA. D5.1 contains analysis of differences and a breakdown of actions that should be taken to bring CESSDA up to the level of the gold standard.
Strategy and Policy, Curation and Preservation
Strategy and Policy, Curation and Preservation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 8 | |
| downloads | 11 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts