Views provided by UsageCounts
The core problem in the distribution dilemma is how to trade-off between equity and efficiency. With the development of socio-economic conditions, the optimal decision will also change between equitable and efficient options. How to nudge decision-makers to make optimal allocation decisions without changing the event itself is extremely important. This study used a mixed design of 3 (division schemes: 12:15:23, 15:23:12, 23:12:15) x 2 (maxim: equity, efficiency) x 2 (stakes: low, medium, high), which explores the impact of additional maximal information on the trade-off between equity and efficiency, and explores whether the stakes and division scheme will affect the nudging effect of the maxim in a Trade-Off Game (TOG). We found that participants were affected by maxim information in decision-making scenarios, and participants showed different equal preference as the maxim information changed, no matter the stakes is small, medium or high. We also found that the nudging effect of the maxim only exists under the condition that the distributor's own interests are not affected.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts