Name: Preliminary Report of Literature Review on Understandings of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research
Keywords: AHSS, understandings, interdisciplinary collaboration, transdisciplinarity, RESEARCH POLICY IMPLICATIONS, arts, Interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinary research, integration, interdisciplinarity; transdisciplinarity; interdisciplinary research; transdisciplinary research; integration; understandings; arts; humanities; social sciences; AHSS; SSH

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Project deliverable , Report , Other literature type 01 Jan 2019Embargo end date: 01 Jan 2019 English Publisher:ZenodoPublicly fundedFunded by:EC | SHAPE-ID, IRC | unidentified

Authors: Vienni Baptista, Bianca; Maryl, Maciej; Wciślik, Piotr; Fletcher, Isabel; Buchner, Anna; Wallace, Doireann; Pohl, Christian;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3760416 , 10.3929/ethz-b-000516070 , 10.5281/zenodo.3760417

handle: 20.500.11850/516070 , 2262/92580

Preliminary Report of Literature Review on Understandings of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research

- Summary
- Subjects
- Related research
  (11)
- Metrics

Abstract

This report presents emerging findings from a literature review being undertaken as part of the SHAPE-ID Horizon 2020 project (https://www.shapeid.eu), which addresses the challenge of improving interdisciplinary research (IDR) and transdisciplinary research (TDR) between Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (AHSS) disciplines and other scientific disciplines. The report describes efforts to build a robust sample of literature, aligning qualitative and quantitative methodologies and beginning to map understandings and factors for success and failure in the literature.

We are grateful to the OpenAire team (Harry Dimitropoulos and Claudio Atzori) for providing the metadata for the analysis and to Poznań Supercomputing and Networking Center (Juliusz Pukacki and Cezary Mazurek) for providing the virtual R-Studio machine capable of crunching data analysed in this project.

Related Organizations

View all View all

Keywords

AHSS, understandings, interdisciplinary collaboration, transdisciplinarity, RESEARCH POLICY IMPLICATIONS, arts, Interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinary research, integration, interdisciplinarity; transdisciplinarity; interdisciplinary research; transdisciplinary research; integration; understandings; arts; humanities; social sciences; AHSS; SSH, 551, Interdisciplinary research, transdisciplinary collaboration, humanities, interdisciplinarity, interdisciplinary research, International Integration, SSH, social sciences

11 Research products, page 1 of 2

Improving pathways to interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research for the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences: first lessons from the SHAPE-ID project – Policy Brief
2020IsSupplementTo
Improving pathways to interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research for the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences: first lessons from the SHAPE-ID project – Policy Brief
2020IsSupplementedBy
SHAPE-ID Literature Review dataset: subject co-occurrence matrix
2020IsDerivedFrom
Inter- and transdisciplinary projects in FP7 and H2020 (May 2019)
2020IsDerivedFrom
SHAPE-ID Literature Review dataset: journal occurrences with ASJC codes
2020IsDerivedFrom
Final Report on Understandings of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research and Factors of Success and Failure
2020IsSupplementedBy
Final Report on Understandings of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research and Factors of Success and Failure
2020IsSupplementTo
SHAPE-ID Literature Review query strings for Web of Science and Scopus
2020IsDerivedFrom
SHAPE-ID Literature Review dataset: bibliography on IDR/TDR
2020IsDerivedFrom
Report on Survey among interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary researchers and post-survey interviews with policy stakeholders
2019IsSupplementedBy

chevron_left
1
2
chevron_right

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	3
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average