Downloads provided by UsageCounts
As the number of datasets available to scientists and the public increases metadata discussions and systems have focused on discovery of data. This is an important step, but, one data are discoverred, they must be usable and understandable in order to be reused confidently. Methods for evaluating metadata must improve beyond comparisons with lists of fields required for discovery. This paper outlines some ideas for approaches to integrated metadata evaliation and improvement.
metadata 2020, organizational change, metadata evaluation, metadata improvement
metadata 2020, organizational change, metadata evaluation, metadata improvement
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 10 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts