Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

MESINESP: Medical Semantic Indexing in Spanish - Development dataset

Authors: Krallinger, Martin; Gonzalez-Agirre, Aitor; Asensio, Alejandro;

MESINESP: Medical Semantic Indexing in Spanish - Development dataset

Abstract

Please use the MESINESP2 corpus (the second edition of the shared-task) since it has a higher level of curation, quality and is organized by document type (scientific articles, patents and clinical trials). Introduction The Mesinesp (Spanish BioASQ track, see https://temu.bsc.es/mesinesp) development set has a total of 750 records indexed manually by seven experienced medical literature indexers. Indexing is done using DeCS codes, a sort of Spanish equivalent to MeSH terms. Records were distributed in a way that each article was annotated, at least, by two different human indexers. The data annotation process consisted in two steps: Manual indexing step. DeCS codes were manually assigned to each record following the DeCS manual indexing guidelines. Manual validation and consensus. The joined set of manually indexed DeCS codes generated by both indexers were manually revised and corrections were done. These annotations were analyzed, resulting in an agreement using the Jaccard index. Records consisted basically in medical literature abstracts and titles from the IBECS and LILACS databases. Zip structure The zip file contains two different development sets: Official development set, which has the union of the annotations, with an agreement of macro = 0.6568 and micro = 0.6819. This set is composed by all the different (unique) DeCS codes that have been added by any annotator for each document; and Core-descriptors development set, which has the intersection of the annotations, with an agreement of macro = 1.0 and micro = 1.0. This set is composed of the common DeCS codes that have been added by two or more annotators for each document. Corpus format Each dataset is a JSON object with one single key named "articles", which contains a list of documents. So, the raw format of the file is one line per document plus two additional lines (the first and the last) to enclose that list of documents and the expected type of data is as follows: {"articles":[ {"abstractText":str,"db":str,"decsCodes":list,"id":str,"journal":str,"title":str,"year":int}, ... ]} To clarify, the order of appearance of the fields in each document is as follows (note that this example it is pretty printed for readability purposes): { "articles": [ { "abstractText": "Content of the abstract", "db": "Name of the source database", "decsCodes": [ "code1", "code2", "code3" ], "id": "Id of the document", "journal": "Name of the journal", "title": "Title of the document", "year": 2019 } ] } Note: The fields "db", "journal" and "year" might be null. Copyright (c) 2020 Secretaría de Estado de Digitalización e Inteligencia Artificial

{"references": ["Krallinger M, Krithara A, Nentidis A, Paliouras G, Villegas M. BioASQ at CLEF2020: Large-Scale Biomedical Semantic Indexing and Question Answering. InEuropean Conference on Information Retrieval 2020 Apr 14 (pp. 550-556). Springer, Cham."]}

Funded by the Plan de Impulso de las Tecnologías del Lenguaje (Plan TL).

Keywords

decs, indexing

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 62
    download downloads 7
  • 62
    views
    7
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
62
7