Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In extensive searching of biomedical literature, especially for systematic reviews, it is common practice and usually required to search multiple databases. Depending on the specific subject it can range from 2 to more than 10 databases. The results will therefore contain many duplicates. But deduplication can be a time-consuming process and is sensitive to faults.We describe a method (the Amsterdam Efficient Deduplication (AED) method) which is efficient, highly reliable and time saving.
deduplication, systematic review, search updates, deduplications references from literature search, systematic search, EndNote, multiple databases
deduplication, systematic review, search updates, deduplications references from literature search, systematic search, EndNote, multiple databases
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 155 | |
| downloads | 38 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts