Views provided by UsageCounts
Jet engine power loss due to ice particle accumulation is a recognized aviation hazard. High-altitude cirrus clouds can have ice particle concentrations high enough to be dangerous; therefore, pilots need to be informed when aircraft enter such environments. One approach to determining ice particle concentration is an onboard lidar system. A lidar does not directly measure ice particle concentrations but uses the measured backscatter coefficient. Concurrent lidar measurements are compared to backscatter coefficients derived from the particle size distribution. Particle measurements are obtained from wing-mounted, in-situ probes during four sixty-second flight segments at different temperatures (+7°C, +4°C, -33°C, -46°C). The backscatter coefficients derived from external cloud probes (ECP) are correlated (R2 of 0.9) with measurements by an airborne lidar system known as the Optical Ice Detector (OID). Differences between the backscatter coefficients range from less than one, to more than three standard deviations of the combined OID and ECP uncertainties. The OID and ECP backscatter coefficients are primarily in agreement for three of the four cases, with disagreement for the -33°C case. The ECP derived backscatter coefficients are lower than the OID for three of the cases, with +7°C being the exception. Measurements over four research flights indicate that the total water content is correlated (R2 of 0.74) with the OID backscatter coefficient. The strong correlation indicates that the OID is a useful instrument for determining ice particle concentrations over a broad range of environments, including at ice water contents as low as 0.02 g per m3.
Cloud Probes, Airborne Measurements, OID, Optical Ice Detector
Cloud Probes, Airborne Measurements, OID, Optical Ice Detector
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts