Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This paper discusses a theory of redundantly specified phonological features as variable phonetic enhancement features (Stevens et al. 1986). It reports on an articulatory study of the American English vowel backing contrast and redundantly specified rounding contrast, showing how the theory of enhancement applies to this case. Analyses show tongue backing to vary considerably, while the presence of (redundantly specified) rounding acts to compensate for cases of reduced tongue backing. Lip rounding thus accounts for a consistent lowering in F2. The redundant specification of rounding makes the backness/rounding distinction more robust to co articulatory influences. These results are discussed with respect to various theories of phonological features and feature geometry.
This paper is copyrighted, and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) - see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 11 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts