Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

On the agreement between bibliometrics and peer review. Supplementary materials

Authors: Baccini, Alberto; Barabesi, Lucio; Nicolao, Giuseppe De;

On the agreement between bibliometrics and peer review. Supplementary materials

Abstract

Data sets and supplementary materials of the paper "On the agreement between bibliometrics and peer review: evidence from the Italian research assessment exercises" DS1_EXP1 and EXP2 data.xls: raw anonymized data of the two experiments EXP1 and EXP2. DS2_Avg_score_vs_perc_peer_review_VQR1_VQR2. average score and proportion of peer review evaluations at a scientific field level. Data from the two Italian research assessment exercises VQR1 and VQR2. SM1_Fig_1_EXP1_geom_count_peer_vs_bibliometrics_all.png: joint distribution of peer review and bibliometrics evaluations for EXP1. R_ggplot: count overlapping points (proportion). All research areas. SM1_Fig_2_EXP1_geom_count_peer_vs_bibliometrics_area.png: joint distribution of peer review and bibliometrics evaluations for EXP1. R_ggplot: count overlapping points (proportion). Separate plot for each research area. SM1_Fig_3_EXP2_geom_count_peer_vs_bibliometrics_all.png: joint distribution of peer review and bibliometrics evaluations for EXP2. All scientific areas. R_ggplot: count overlapping points (proportion). All areas. SM1_Fig_4_EXP2_geom_count_peer_vs_bibliometrics_area.png: joint distribution of peer review and bibliometrics evaluations for EXP2. R_ggplot: count overlapping points (proportion). Separate plot for each research area. SM2_Fig_1_VQR1_plot_avg_score_percentage_peer.png: Average score and percentage of articles evaluated by peer review for research fields in VQR1. All areas. SM2_Fig_2_VQR1_avg_score_vs_percentage_peer: Regression lines for average score and percentage of articles evaluated by peer review for different research areas. VQR1. SM2_Fig_3_VQR2_plot_avg_score_percentage_peer.png: Average score and percentage of articles evaluated by peer review for research fields in VQR2. All areas. SM2_Fig_4_VQR2_avg_score_vs_percentage_peer: Regression lines for average score and percentage of articles evaluated by peer review for different research areas. VQR2. SM_supplementary_table_linear_weights.pdf: Cohen's kappa estimates with linear weights for EXP1 and EXP2. 4 tables.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Cohen's kappa, stratified random sampling, Italy, Bibliometrics, testing homogeneity of missing proportions, Research evaluation, Gwet's kappa, design based estimation, agreement between bibliometrics and peer review, Research assessments exercise, Peer review

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 9
    download downloads 12
  • 9
    views
    12
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
9
12