Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2020
License: CC BY ND
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type . 2020
License: CC BY ND
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The PANDA challenge: Prostate cANcer graDe Assessment using the Gleason grading system

Authors: Bulten, Wouter; Litjens, Geert; Pinckaers, Hans; Ström, Peter; Eklund, Martin; Kartasalo, Kimmo; Demkin, Maggie; +1 Authors

The PANDA challenge: Prostate cANcer graDe Assessment using the Gleason grading system

Abstract

This is the challenge design document for the "The PANDA challenge: Prostate cANcer graDe Assessment using the Gleason grading system", accepted for MICCAI 2020. With 1.1 million new diagnoses every year, prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men in developed countries. The biopsy Gleason grading system is the most important prognostic marker for prostate cancer but suffers from significant inter-observer variability, limiting its usefulness for individual patients. The Gleason grade is determined by pathologists on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained tissue specimens based on the architectural growth patterns of the tumor. Automated deep learning systems have shown promise in accurately grading prostate cancer. Several studies have shown that these systems can achieve pathologist-level performance. A large multi-center evaluation on diagnostic data is still missing. In this challenge, we strive to improve on these works by publishing the most extensive multi-center dataset on Gleason grading as of yet. The training set consists of up to 11.000 whole-slide images of digitized H&E-stained biopsies originating from two centers. This is the largest public whole-slide image dataset available, roughly 8 times the size of the CAMELYON17 challenge. Furthermore, in contrast to previous challenges, we do not use small tissue micro-arrays, but full diagnostic biopsy images. Using a sizeable multicenter test set, graded by expert uropathologists, we will evaluate challenge submissions on their applicability to a clinically relevant task

Keywords

MICCAI Challenges, Prostate cancer, Gleason grading, Biomedical Challenges, Computer-aided diagnosis, Computational pathology, MICCAI

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 226
    download downloads 213
  • 226
    views
    213
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
5
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
226
213
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research