Downloads provided by UsageCounts
## Predicting pathogenic potentials from NGS reads: novel bacterial species This repository contains simulated Illumina read datasets for bacterial pathogenic potential prediction and associated metadata extracted from the IMG Database (https://img.jgi.doe.gov/). The reads are 250bp long and were simulated with Mason (https://www.seqan.de/apps/mason/) from genomes downloaded from NCBI. The training-validation-test split was done on the species level to ensure "novelty" of validation and test species. The training sets contain 10 million reads per class, validation sets - 1.25 million reads per class, and test sets - 1.25 million paired reads per class. Additional, imbalanced training sets contain 2.5 million "nonpathogenic" and 17.5 million "pathogenic" reads, keeping the mean covarage constant for all species. The temporal benchmark test set contains reads from 3 additional pathogenic species in the Pantoea genus. ## Predicting pathogenic potentials from NGS reads: novel strains of known species The BacPaCS datasets contain reads simulated from the dataset compiled by Barash et al. (https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty928). It this case, the training-validation-test split was done on the strain level (so different strains of the same species may be present in all three sets).
{"references": ["Barash, E. et al. (2019), BacPaCS\u2014Bacterial Pathogenicity Classification via Sparse-SVM. Bioinformatics, 35(12), 2001\u20132008", "Chen, I.-M. A. et al. (2019). IMG/M v.5.0: an integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes. Nucleic Acids Research, 47(D1), D666\u2013D677."]}
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Deep Learning, Bioinformatics, NGS, Pathogenicity, Synthetic Biology, Prediction
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Deep Learning, Bioinformatics, NGS, Pathogenicity, Synthetic Biology, Prediction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 70 | |
| downloads | 80 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts