Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This excel sheet contains, for each of the four studied cities, the conceptual framework that is described in the paper "Keep it real: Selecting realistic sets of urban green space indicators". Each of the cities first listed all possible indicators that they could think of. Next, they indicated how each of those indicators relates to each of the KPI; i.e. whether the indicator can not at all (0), somewhat (1) or perfectly measure (2) the KPI. Lastly, the city authorities indicated whether the indicators are implemented of not, and scored some measures of indicator quality (relevance, feasibility, clarity, and credibility)
The study was funded by the BiodivERsA3 project UrbanGaia (BiodivERsA3-2015-143; No. S-BIODIVERSA-17-17-1 from the Research Council of Lithuania).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 11 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts