CESSDA SaW Case Study on Toolkit Advocacy Focus Groups

This case study from the Lithuanian Data Archive for Social Sciences and Humanities (LiDA) reports on testing in focus groups of the emerging cost-benefit advocacy toolkit during 2016. The focus groups were of two types: for staff from the social science data archive; and for their key stakeholders. It is intended to be used with other components of the CESSDA Saw Cost-Benefit Advocacy Toolkit to help you understand the approaches and tools available and to support your advocacy to funders and policymakers.

1 Research products, page 1 of 1

CESSDA SaW Cost-Benefit Advocacy Toolkit
2017IsPartOf

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average