Views provided by UsageCounts
Supplementary data to the article Gong, S. and Wieczorek, M. (2020) Is the lunar magnetic field correlated with gravity or topography? Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. This archive contains the Bouguer gravity model used in the analyses of the above cited manuscript, as well as the data files to reproduce Figures 2-3 and Figures S1-S3. For the correlation results, the bandwidth and angular radius of the window were 26 and 10 degrees, respectively, which yields a concentration factor that is better than 99%. FILE DESCRIPTIONS 34_12_3220_900_80_misfit.sh This file contains the spherical harmonic coefficients of the Bouguer gravity model up to degree and order 900. The two values in the first row correspond to the reference radius of the model in km and the constant GM in km^3/s^-2. To generate this model, all known gravitational contributions from the crust were removed from the free-air gravity, including surface relief, lateral variations in crustal density, and crustal thickness variations. The crustal thickness model is from Wieczorek et al. (2013), which has an average thickness of 34 km, a constant crustal porosity of 12%, and a mantle density of 3200 kg/m^3. mc_total_10_26_1_surface.dat Data used to generate the lower panel of Figure 2. This file contains the 95% confidence limits of the average correlation from the Monte Carlo simulations which were performed every 30 degrees in both longitude and latitude. The first two columns correspond to the latitude and longitude, and the third to fifth columns correspond to the 95% confidence limits by using topography, total free-air gravity, and total Bouger gravity, respectively. spec_10_26_1_surface.dat Data used to generate Figure 3. Correlation results between total magnetic field and topography, total free-air gravity, and total Bouguer gravity at the surface. The first two columns correspond to the latitude and longitude, and the third to fifth columns correspond to the ratio between the average correlation and its 95% confidence limits by using topography, total free-air gravity, and total Bouger gravity, respectively. If the value is equal to or greater than 1, this indicates that the total magnetic field is positively correlated with the testing field (topography, total free-air gravity, or total Bouguer gravity); If the value is equal to or less than -1, this indicates that the total magnetic field is negatively correlated with the testing field. spec_10_26_1_surface_4lwin.dat Data used to generate Figure S1. Correlation results calculated at the surface by removing the first 4*lwin degrees. spec_10_26_1_30km.dat Data used to generate Figure S2. Correlation results calculated at 30 km altitude. spec_10_26_1_surface_3sigma.dat Data used to generate Figure S3. Correlation results calculated at the surface by using the 99% confidence limits.
Magnetic field, Moon
Magnetic field, Moon
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts