Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This is an assessment rubric for DMPs following the NWO Data Management Plan template in force from January 2020, which matches the Science Europe’s Core Requirements for Data Management Plans. This rubric is intended to assist in the assessment of NWO data management plans, against the criteria required by NWO. The rubric has been divided into 'performance criteria' (on the left hand side) that match the questions and guidance in the NWO DMP template (version January 2020). Each performance criterion is followed by descriptions (‘performance levels’) outlining what NWO considers to be a sufficient and an insufficient level of response. The descriptions are intended as examples of how the performance criteria might be addressed, based on the DMP template and its respective guidance, and are not considered to be exhaustive. NWO encourages researchers to be as detailed as possible in completing data management plans for NWO-funded projects. This rubric is inspired by and based on the Wellcome DMP assessment rubric v2.0 (http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.257650) and the Ghent University rubrics for DMPs (https://github.com/DMPbelgium/Guidance/tree/master/DMPReviewRubrics).
{"references": ["Marta Teperek, Ben Mollitt, John Southall, & Mary Donaldson. (2017, January 23). Wellcome DMP assessment rubric v2.0. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.257650", "Schipper, Pieter, Cruz, Maria, & de Jonge, Hans. (2019). NWO Data Management Plan Template. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3569201"]}
FAIR data, Data Management Policy, RDM, Research Data Management, NWO, Data Management Plan, DMP, Assessment Rubric
FAIR data, Data Management Policy, RDM, Research Data Management, NWO, Data Management Plan, DMP, Assessment Rubric
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 285 | |
| downloads | 153 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts