Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Here are the scripts associated with the manuscript "Comparison of phosphoproteomics data analysis pipelines: search engines and localization scoring algorithms" where we compared pipelines implemented in the main software used for bottom-up phosphoproteomics analysis (MaxQuant, Proteome Discoverer, PeptideShaker). We tested six search engines (Andromeda, Comet, Mascot, MS Amanda, SequestHT, X!Tandem) in combination with several localization scoring algorithms (delta scores, D-scores, PTM-score, phosphoRS, Ascore) on two published data sets. We compared their performances, and estimated which false localization rate these thresholds translate to across the different analysis pipelines.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts