Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
International Journal of Advanced Research
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

STUDY OF PATHOGENS CAUSING BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS WITH THEIR ANTIBIOGRAM IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

Authors: Tharangini Karicheti; P. Ratna Kumari; R. Lakshmi Kumari;

STUDY OF PATHOGENS CAUSING BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS WITH THEIR ANTIBIOGRAM IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

Abstract

Introduction: Bloodstream infection is the most common health care associated infection and a significant cause of mortality and morbidity. Early and appropriate antibiotic therapy is crucial in the treatment of BSI. In the current era of improper use of antibiotics, there is a rise of antimicrobial resistance in bloodstream infections. Policies should be devised to control this by the proper and effective use of antibiotics. Aim and Objectives: To study the etiological microbial agents of bloodstream infections and their susceptibility pattern in a tertiary care centre over a period of one year. Materials and Methods: 467 blood culture samples received from different departments of GGH, Vijayawada, A.P, from October 2016 to September 2017, were processed as per standard microbiological procedures. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done as per CLSI guidelines. Results: Out of 467 blood culture samples, 104(22.2%) were culture positive, 363 were culture negative. Among culture positives,43( 41.3% )were Staphylococcus aureus, 17(16.67% )Klebsiella species, 4 Escherichia coli. On repeated subcultures 35( 34.3%) Coagulase negative Staphylococcus, 3(2.9%)Pseudomonas species were isolated. Gram-positive isolates were mostly sensitive to Vancomycin, Amoxycillin plus Sulbactam and resistant to ampicillin and cefotaxime. Gram negative isolates were mainly sensitive to Piperacillin Tazobactam, Imipenem and resistant to Levofloxacin, Cefotaxime. Conclusion: The present study shows that Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella species are the most common causative agents and most effective antibiotics are vancomycin and Piperacillin tazobactam, Imipenem, respectively.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Infection Blood Antibiogram

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 19
    download downloads 8
  • 19
    views
    8
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
19
8
Green
gold