Downloads provided by UsageCounts
A discussion of the "Diversity Debate" in the Digital Humanities, with particular reference to DH 2016. Chapter compares DH as a paradiscipline to area disciplines such as Medieval Studies and argues a) that "Diversity" cannot be distinguished from "Quality" within the Digital Humanities; and b) even if it could, "Diversity" would be more important than "Quality" for the progress of the field. Concludes with a discussion on the importance (and ethics) of discussing ostensibly private or closed debates among "gatekeeper" committees within DH, arguing that such conversations have played an outsized role in the development of the field and must be treated as a core part of the discipline's history.
ADHO (Alliance of Digital Humanities Organisations), Humanities--Technological innovations, Diversity, Digital Humanities conference, Diversity within digital humanities, DH 2016 (Conference), Quality, Digital Humanities, Intersectional diversity, Quality vs. diversity, Quality within digital humanities, Medieval studies, Digital scholarship, Medieval Studies, Digital humanities
ADHO (Alliance of Digital Humanities Organisations), Humanities--Technological innovations, Diversity, Digital Humanities conference, Diversity within digital humanities, DH 2016 (Conference), Quality, Digital Humanities, Intersectional diversity, Quality vs. diversity, Quality within digital humanities, Medieval studies, Digital scholarship, Medieval Studies, Digital humanities
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 18 | |
| downloads | 23 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts