Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

In silico Database for Identification of Microorganisms by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS1)

Authors: Peter Lasch; Andy Schneider; Chistian Blumenscheit; Joerg Doellinger;

In silico Database for Identification of Microorganisms by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS1)

Abstract

Modern methods of mass spectrometry have emerged recently allowing reliable, fast and cost-effective identification of pathogenic microorganisms. For example, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) has revolutionized the way pathogenic microorganisms are identified in today’s routine clinical microbiology. Furthermore, recent years have witnessed also substantial progress in the development of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) based proteomics for microbiological applications. In this context, we introduce a new concept for microbial identification by mass spectrometry. The proposed approach involves efficient extraction of proteins from cultivated microbial cells, digestion by trypsin and LC-MS measurements. MS1 data are then extracted and systematically tested against in silico libraries of peptide mass data. The first version of such a database has been computed from UniProt Knowledgebase [Swiss-Prot and TrEMBL] and contains more than 12,000 strain-specific synthetic mass profiles. The database is stored in the pkf data format which is interpretable by the MicrobeMS software package (requires MicrobeMS version 0.82, or later). For details see the following preprint: Lasch, P. Schneider, A. Blumenscheit, C. and Doellinger, J. “Identification of Microorganisms by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS1) and in silico Peptide Mass Data”. bioRxiv preprint, http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/870089.

License type for the database: Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC): Licensees must credit the original authors by stating their names & the original work's title. Licensees may copy, distribute, display, and perform the work and make derivative works and remixes based on it only for non-commercial purposes.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Mass spectrometry, LC-MS, Microorganisms, Identification, Database, MicrobeMS

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 14
    download downloads 5
  • 14
    views
    5
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
14
5