Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The digital revolution changed film production in many ways. Until the end of the 20th century, most film professionals and critics preferred celluloid film. However, no previous empirical study compared complete narrative films recorded with analog and digital cinematography. Three short narrative films were produced with an analog and a digital camera attached to a 3D rig in order to control all optical parameters. In postproduction, a third version of a digital film was created to mimic the analog film aesthetics. In a cinema experiment with 356 participants, we tested whether the three film versions are perceived differently. The two capturing technologies produced similar emotional and immersive experiences during digital projection. The study revealed significant differences in the memory of visual details, with higher recall scores for the digitally captured versions. By contrast, preference ratings of very short scenes and the comparison of projection types revealed different results. The mechanical projection of celluloid film produced higher levels of emotional reactions. The results might be of interest to film professionals and audience in general. This study shows that the gap between analog and digital aesthetics has been closed with today's advanced digital technology.
+ ID: 548237 + PeerReviewed: Peer Reviewed
3204 Developmental and Educational Psychology, 700 Arts, Cognitive Psychology, Digital Cinema, 3202 Applied Psychology, Practice-Based Research, 1213 Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Cinema Experiment, Analog Film, 10114 Department of Film Studies, Audience Research, Film Perception, 900 History, Field Research
3204 Developmental and Educational Psychology, 700 Arts, Cognitive Psychology, Digital Cinema, 3202 Applied Psychology, Practice-Based Research, 1213 Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Cinema Experiment, Analog Film, 10114 Department of Film Studies, Audience Research, Film Perception, 900 History, Field Research
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 13 | |
| downloads | 15 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts