Locking the front door without leaving the windows open: positioning authentication technologies within the "Five Safes" framework for effective use of sensitive research data

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Conference object , Other literature type , Presentation , Report 20 Nov 2019 English Publisher:Zenodo

Authors: Churches, Tim; Jorm, Louisa;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3547979 , 10.5281/zenodo.3547980 , 10.5281/zenodo.3548037 , 10.5281/zenodo.3547889 , 10.5281/zenodo.3548036 , 10.5281/zenodo.3547890

Locking the front door without leaving the windows open: positioning authentication technologies within the "Five Safes" framework for effective use of sensitive research data

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

This project explores the options for access to sensitive data sets; what authentication technologies (e.g. multi-factor authentication) are needed to access sensitive data and secure compute environments. This project seeks to position choices around authentication technologies within the Five Safes framework for research use of sensitive data, proposed in 2003 by Felix Ritchie of the UK Office of National Statistics: • Safe Projects: is the proposed research use of the data appropriate? • Safe People: can the users be trusted to use the data in an appropriate manner? • Safe Settings: does the access facility limit unauthorised use? • Safe Data: is there a disclosure risk in the data itself? • Safe Outputs: are the research results non-disclosive i.e. they do not compromise privacy or breach confidentiality?

Related Organizations

UNSW Sydney
Australia

Keywords

Infrastructure, eResearch, Storage and Compute Summit, NCRIS, training material, ARDC, FAIR

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average