Views provided by UsageCounts
This workshop was delivered at the Annual Meeting of the PhD-students of the Graduate School Neurosciences Amsterdam Rotterdam (ONWAR). The workshop is based on a paper with same title by Erin C McKiernan et al. published in eLife in 2016 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800). The authors of this paper take a researcher-centric approach in outlining the benefits of open research practices. This workshop took a similar approach. Together, working in groups and through an interactive presentation, we looked at the benefits of open science and also at the barriers to adoption of open research practices. The participants shared examples of best practice and advice on how to practice open science within the existing academic incentive frameworks.
open access, open science
open access, open science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts