Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A COMPARATIVE RESEARCH TO COMPARE AND CONTRAST THE TREATMENT SUCCESS BETWEEN TWO DIFFERENT TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR THE PATIENTS OF HYPERPROLACTINEMIC INFERTILITY

Authors: Dr. Aroosa Ishaque, Dr. Alia Iftkhar, Dr. Naila Mubashir;

A COMPARATIVE RESEARCH TO COMPARE AND CONTRAST THE TREATMENT SUCCESS BETWEEN TWO DIFFERENT TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR THE PATIENTS OF HYPERPROLACTINEMIC INFERTILITY

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this research was to compare the success rate of treatment between bromocriptine plus clomiphene citrate and bromocriptine among patients of hyperprolactinemic infertility. Materials & Methods: We conducted this comparative research at Allied Hospital Faisalabad from February 2018 to January 2019 on a total of 180 hyperprolactinemic infertility patients. These patients were shortlisted in the age bracket of (20 – 40) years. The study commenced after ethical review committee permission and informed consent of the patients. Results: In the age bracket of 20 years to 40 years the mean age was (29.68 ± 5.45) years. Patients were divided into two groups respectively Group A & B with respective mean age of (28.47 ± 3.22) years and (27.58 ± 4.52) years. We also compared the rate of treatment success among both groups. The success rate in Group – A was reported in 56 patients (62.22%); whereas, Group – B presented a success rate among 73 patients (81.11%). Study Group – B presented a significantly higher success rate of treatment than the patients of Group – A (P-Value 0.0078). Conclusion: Study outcomes speak for the efficacy of bromocriptine plus clomiphene citrate in comparison to sole bromocriptine as a treatment approach to manage hyperprolactinemic infertility. Therefore, the use of bromocriptine plus clomiphene citrate as a treatment option is suggested over the use of bromocriptine alone for the achievement of the majority of pregnancies among women with the hyperprolactinemic infertile profile. Keywords: Prolactin, Pregnancy, Female Infertility, Efficacy, Bromocriptine, Clomiphene Citrate and Bromocriptine

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
    download downloads 2
  • 2
    views
    2
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
2
Green
Related to Research communities