Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2015
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2015
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
International Journal of Epidemiology
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

The Impact of Folic Acid Food Fortification on Global Incidence of Neural Tube Defects: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Estimate of Preventable Cases.

Authors: Brinkhof, M.; Meier, S.; Chamberlain, J.; Mader, L.;

The Impact of Folic Acid Food Fortification on Global Incidence of Neural Tube Defects: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Estimate of Preventable Cases.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Folic acid intake has been proven to reduce the risk of neural tube defects (NTDs), including spina bifida and anencephaly, which belong to the most common birth defects, occurring in approximately 1/1000 births. Despite this evidence, folic acid food fortification (FAFF) has not been universally adopted due to concerns regarding adverse health effects; concerns which have been largely disproven in recent research. Objective: To assess the global impact of FAFF on the incidence of NTDs and to estimate the number of potentially preventable NTD cases through implementation of FAFF worldwide. METHODS: A systematic literature search identified studies reporting NTD incidence rates (IR) ( n = 163). Included studies were assessed for quality according to the Centers for Review and Dissemination (CRD) guidelines. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the global IR of NTD without FAFF, and the effect size of FAFF. In a multivariate meta-regression analysis we determined if pre-FAFF incidence rates can predict the effect size of FAFF in the corresponding populations. The number of cases with NTDs that could be prevented globally through worldwide mandatory FAFF was calculated using birth data obtained from the United Nations population division. RESULTS: Incidence of NTDs among studies including only live births ranged between 3.8/10,000 (United States) to 82.1/10,000 (India) with an overall IR of 14.1/10,000 (CI = 12.3–16.1). FAFF reduced the incidence of NTDs by 37% (IR Ratio: 0.63 CI = 0.57–0.69; I2 = 89.3%). The IR before FAFF was significantly associated with the effect size of FAFF ( P = 0.03). We estimate, using recent world population data and information on countries legislation to mandate FAFF, roughly 70,000 preventable births with NTDs. CONCLUSIONS: Recent research has shown the benefits of FAFF to outweigh the possible risks. Our results suggest that FAFF would prevent a large number of NTD cases, especially in low income countries, and that worldwide adoption of mandatory FAFF should be considered.

Country
Switzerland
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 6
    download downloads 21
  • 6
    views
    21
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
3
Average
Average
Average
6
21
Green
bronze