Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Rules of professional conduct constitute a global practice and were established well before the foundation of permanent International Criminal Court or the ad hoc / hybrid international criminal tribunals. Therefore professional rules of conduct are absolutely essential for the proper function of the International Criminal Court as an international judicial mechanism too. The ICC Code of Professional Code for Counsel (hereinafter CPCC) was adopted at the third plenary meeting of the Assembly of States Parties on 2 December 2005 pursuant to Article 8 of the ICC Rules of Procedure and Evidence. However a counsel admitted to the prestigious ICC List of Counsel receives his/her training and principal admission nationally, at his/her respective state; and understandably each state has each own sets of rules and procedures. The presentation made on 23 October 2019 at the ICC premises examines the interrelation between the ICC disciplinary competence and the national jurisdictions' disciplinary powers; it focuses on the analysis of the principle of complementarity in disciplinary proceedings and the exemptions to the complementarity principle
{"references": ["Till Gut, COUNSEL MISCONDUCT BEFORE THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, (Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing), 2012"]}
ICC Disciplinary Board, ICC disciplinary proceedings, ICC disciplinary competence, exemptions to the complementarity principle, Code of Professional Conduct for ICC Counsel, counsel's national jurisdictions, national disciplinary proceedings
ICC Disciplinary Board, ICC disciplinary proceedings, ICC disciplinary competence, exemptions to the complementarity principle, Code of Professional Conduct for ICC Counsel, counsel's national jurisdictions, national disciplinary proceedings
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 41 | |
| downloads | 9 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts