Views provided by UsageCounts
This data set contains stimuli, results and code for statistical analysis of a localisation experiment where humans had to report the perceived direction of a source. The stimuli were presented via dynamic binaural synthesis with the SoundScape Renderer. The experiment was conducted to evaluate the used apparatus for localisation experiments and the experimental results are compared to two previous studies: Hagen Wierstorf, Sascha Spors and Alexander Raake (2012): Perception and evaluation of sound fields. Proc. of the 59th Open Seminar on Acoustics, Boszkowo, Poland Fiete Winter, Hagen Wierstorf and Sascha Spors (2017): Improvement of the reporting method for closed-loop human localization experiments. Proc. of the 142nd Audio Eng. Soc. Convention, Berlin, Germany The source code is licensed under GPL v3. Overview: The folder 'stimuli' contains the impulse responses for the SoundScape Renderer as WAV files and the anechoic audio content (white noise pulses). The folder 'experimental_results' contains the data saved in the listening experiment as CSV files. The folder 'statistics' contains a Matlab script analysing the data and converting the experimental results to CSV files for R and an R script that performs further statistical analysis.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts