Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-47665-6_13 , 10.5281/zenodo.3477619 , 10.48550/arxiv.1910.03855 , 10.5281/zenodo.3477620
arXiv: 1910.03855
handle: 10481/57261
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-47665-6_13 , 10.5281/zenodo.3477619 , 10.48550/arxiv.1910.03855 , 10.5281/zenodo.3477620
arXiv: 1910.03855
handle: 10481/57261
In 2009, Torres-Salinas & Moed proposed the use of library catalogs to analyze the impact and dissemination of academic books in different ways. Library Catalog Analysis (LCA) can be defined as the application of bibliometric techniques to a set of online library catalogs in order to describe quantitatively a scientific-scholarly field on the basis of published book titles. The aim of the present chapter is to conduct an in-depth analysis of major scientific contributions since the birth of LCA in order to determine the state of the art of this research topic. Hence, our specific objectives are: 1) to discuss the original purposes of library holdings 2) to present correlations between library holdings and altmetrics indicators and interpret their feasible meanings 3) to analyze the principal sources of information 4) to use WorldCat Identities to identify the principal authors and works in the field of Informetrics.
Unrevised version to be published in "Evaluative informetrics – the art of metrics based research assessment. Festschrift in honour of Henk F. Moed", edited by Cinzia Daraio and Wolfgang Glänzel.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Altmetrics, Books, Social Sciences, Computer Science - Digital Libraries, Library Catalog Analysis, Library Holdings Analysis, Libcitations, FOS: Humanities, Research Assessment, Humanities, Digital Libraries (cs.DL), Monographs
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Altmetrics, Books, Social Sciences, Computer Science - Digital Libraries, Library Catalog Analysis, Library Holdings Analysis, Libcitations, FOS: Humanities, Research Assessment, Humanities, Digital Libraries (cs.DL), Monographs
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 10 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts