In the development of labor law, Law No. 2 of 2004 exists as a new alternative in efforts to resolve industrial relations aimed at realizing justice in the industrial world. However, the provisions in Article 58 of Law Number 2 Year 2004 have shown the opposite. This is because since the birth of Article 58 of Law Number 2 of 2004, decisions from industrial relations courts in any industrial relations dispute have resulted in uncertainty over the term of execution of the award and the absence of sanctions also for the guilty party when it fails to fulfill the execution of the existing decision. This is further complicated by the absence of legal remedies for violating the execution of existing industrial relations disputes. So that this results in violation of justice especially for workers, the violation of justice clearly also violates the mandate of the Pancasila, the fourth paragraph opening of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, and Article 28 D paragraph (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945. Therefore, this article with the sociological juridical method intends to discuss the issue of the execution of judicial decisions on industrial relations disputes that have not been fair, especially in the city of Semarang.