Views provided by UsageCounts
Description This package contains a set of functions to conduct a Conjunctive Analysis of Case Configurations (CACC; Miethe, Hart & Regoeczi, 2008). CACC is an exploratory technique for multivariate analysis of categorical data, posing an alternative to other traditional methods. Although initially conceived as a technique for analysing criminological data, CACC can be applied in a wide variety of contexts, permitting composite profiles of particular units of analysis to be examined. “cacc” is the first and foremost function. This function collects a data frame to execute a CACC. As a result, it returns another data frame that contains only the dominant profiles observed in the data, the number of times each profile is observed, as well as the probability the outcome for each profile is observed. “importance_variable” is used to calculate the weight of the variables in the result. This function can be useful for the selection of variables to be included in the CACC from a data-driven approach. “cacc_xsq” applies a chi-square test on the “cacc” output to determine if there is a significant concentration of cases in the observed dominant profiles, as described in Hart (2019). “sci” applies a modified version for configural analysis of the Gini coefficient on the “cacc” output to quantify the relative magnitude of CACC results, as described in Hart (2019). “gg_lorenz_curve” plots a visualization of the “sci” output using the Lorenz curve. “main_effect” is used to calculate the specific weight of each of the variables included in the CACC on the result, while controlling for the effect of the others. This function is applied on the data frame to identify all pairs of identical profiles except for one variable, as described in Hart and Moneva (2018). This function then calculates the differential probability between each pair of profiles. As a result, the descriptive statistics of each of the variables analysed are presented, together with a boxplot that allows the effect of each variable on the result to be visualised.
{"references": ["Hart, T. C. (2019). Identifying Situational Clustering and Quantifying Its Magnitude in Dominant Case Configurations: New Methods for Conjunctive Analysis.\u00a0Crime & Delinquency, 0011128719866123.", "Hart, T. C., & Moneva, A. (2018). An\u00e1lisis Conjunto de Configuraciones de Caso: una introducci\u00f3n al Pensamiento Configural.\u00a0Revista Espa\u00f1ola de Investigaci\u00f3n Criminol\u00f3gica,\u00a016, 1-19.", "Miethe, T. D., Hart, T. C., & Regoeczi, W. C. (2008). The conjunctive analysis of case configurations: An exploratory method for discrete multivariate analyses of crime data.\u00a0Journal of Quantitative Criminology,\u00a024(2), 227-241."]}
conjunctive analysis, CRAN, methodology
conjunctive analysis, CRAN, methodology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts