Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.34689
This analysis assesses the way ecology journals handle code and software written for scientific research. The results of the analysis were used to create Figure 1 in Mislan et al. (2016). Please cite the following paper if you use this data/code: Mislan, K. A. S., J. M. Heer, and E.P. White. (2016) Elevating the status of code in ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.11.006
Acknowledgements: K.A.S. was supported by the Washington Research Foundation Fund for Innovation in Data-Intensive Discovery and the Moore/Sloan Data Science Environments Project at the University of Washington. This work was partially supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation's Data-Driven Discovery Initiative through grant GBMF4553 to J.M.H. and grant GBMF4563 to E.P.W.
Ecology, Code, FOS: Biological sciences, Software
Ecology, Code, FOS: Biological sciences, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 12 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts