Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10138/306842
This paper surveys the occurrence of gender and numeral classifiers in the languages of the world and evaluates statistically whether there is a complexity tradeoff between these two linguistic patterns. Complexity is measured as overt coding of the pattern in a language, an approach that has been shown earlier to provide a reliable first estimate for possible trade-offs between typological variables. The data come from a genealogically and areally stratified sample of 360 languages. The relationship between gender and numeral classifiers in this data was researched by constructing Generalized Linear Mixed Models. According to the results a significant inverse relationship occurs between the variables independently of genealogical affiliation and geographical areas. The distributions are explained functionally. by economy, that is, the tendency to avoid using multiple patterns in the same functional domain
Peer reviewed
numeral classifiers, Language complexity, language contact, description-based complexity, Linguistic areality, complexity trade-off, distinctness, Typology, economy, language universals, Languages, gender, mixed effects modeling, grammatical gender, Numeral classifiers
numeral classifiers, Language complexity, language contact, description-based complexity, Linguistic areality, complexity trade-off, distinctness, Typology, economy, language universals, Languages, gender, mixed effects modeling, grammatical gender, Numeral classifiers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 15 | |
| downloads | 16 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts