Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This paper proposes to explore the opportunities offered by the TEI in the context of this specific type of publications. In a first step, it will address a series of publishing issues that are likely to be eased by using the TEI as a format for scholarly journals (among others questions of archiving, accessibility, interoperability). In a second step, it will draw from two experiences to define the specific challenges involved by the use of the TEI in scholarly journals in the Humanities. The evolutions of the Journal of the TEI during the 3 years where I have been its Managing Editor will be presented, and with them, the challenges that led to strategic decisions, their impact and the way they are likely to evolve in the future. Finally, I will draw on an experimentation with a data journal platform to present an alternative publication and evaluation model, its possible implementation and its meaning for the Humanities at large.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 12 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts