Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

Concurrent Chemoradiation In Locally Advanced Head And Neck Cancer --Capecitabine & Cisplatin Vs Cisplatin- A Randomised Prospective Comparative Study

Authors: Koustav Mazumder *, Shyamal K Sarkar;

Concurrent Chemoradiation In Locally Advanced Head And Neck Cancer --Capecitabine & Cisplatin Vs Cisplatin- A Randomised Prospective Comparative Study

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aim of my study is to compare the response and toxicity profile of squamous cell carcinoma of Head & Neck(SCHNC) patients when in concurrent chemoradiation( CTRT) Capectabine is combined with cisplatin vs cisplatin alone. METHODS: 55 patients of stage III/IV nonmetastatic SCHNC patients were either treated with CTRT with Cisplatin & Capecitabine arm(Arm A, n=29), or with Cisplatin (Arm B, n=26). In both the arm Radiotherapy dose was 66 - 70 Gy in conventional fractionation. Response was assessed by RECIST criteria after 6 wks of completion of treatment and acute toxicities by the RTOG/EORTC guideline. Comparison was done by Chi-Square test, Fisher’s Exact test & Independent T test using SPSS Software. RESULTS: It was seen that 65.5% patient in Arm A & 34.6% patients in Arm B [p=.022] showed complete response. The grade 2/3 acute toxicities of Skin, Mucous Membrane ,Salivary gland in Arm A & B were 72.4% & 30.8% [p=.005]; 69%&15.4% [p<.001]; 58.6% & 11.5% [p<.001] respectively. Significant acute grade 2/3 toxicities of Esopagus+pharynx [p<.001],Larynx[p=.001] &Upper GI tract[p=.001] were also present in the patients of ArmA. COLCLUSIONS: In locally advanced nonmetastatic SCHNC during CTRT combining Capecitabine with Cisplatin results in significant response benefit but toxicities are more.

Keywords

CAPECITABINE CISPLATIN CHEMORADIATION

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
    download downloads 1
  • 3
    views
    1
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
1
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research